Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Disturbing News

I've been sitting here at the computer for awhile trying to decide what to write.  It seems like this first blog posting should be given considerable thought because it might set the tone for all that follow after it.  Writing is not as easy as some people might have you to believe.  There are so many choices to consider like audience, style, tone and approach. Who am I writing to?  Do I want to be serious?  Do I want to try humor, which is often so hard to pull off on the printed or web page that what the author thought was funny, the audience finds dull, pedantic or just downright offensive?  This isn't academic or professional writing, however, so maybe I ought not think about it too much.  

I normally might want to try to write about something not very serious, but if you're supposed to "write what you know," then I suppose I ought to choose a topic that I already know a lot about...

But where would the fun in that be?  I would normally write about comic books or something literature related, but I keep getting these disturbing news alerts on my phone. I really should turn those blasted news alerts off because they only inform me about horrible things that I can do nothing about.  But every time I go to delete them, or at the very least silence them, I find that I am ultimately unable to do so because my desire to know about the world proves stronger.  It is good that people are so curious; when we start turning off our curiosity buttons, we stop being able to grow as people.  Self-knowledge is the most important kind of knowledge, but we cannot have that if we don't know the world, too, and our place in the world.

That's why when I saw the news article discussing President Obama and the debt crisis facing the US, I was dumbfounded.  When he was asked if the Social Security checks may not be able to go out next month because the money may not be there, I thought of every time I have had to pay a bill, and the money simply was not there.  It is a terrifying concept, and while I feel for the people who have to sort through that mess, I am more afraid for people like my dad who depend on Social Security.  It seems like the people who are so free with government money, who send it all around the world, don't care all that much for the people who are here.  I suppose if you have never really wanted for the essentials, then the fact that many people depend on Social Security for food, clothing and shelter doesn't really phase or upset you.  I can't help but think that it must be nice to have so much that the day to day concerns of real people aren't a concern after all.  We're not talking about lazy people who don't want to work; we're talking about people who worked all their lives but because of the value that people placed on their jobs, their hard work went unrewarded.  

I worked with a young lady at Macy's who also worked full time at Wal-Mart.  So, she worked one full-time job and one part-time, and she only had one child.  Even though she worked nearly 60 hours a week, she still qualified for government assistance because her income still below the poverty line.  The politicians don't seem to care much about people like her.  She will likely work herself to death, and never have health benefits, retirement benefits, or any other benefit other than a dead-end job.  And when she reaches retirement age, they will tell her there is no Social Security for her.  What did she do that was so wrong that she deserves to live in poverty?  Why is it so easy for politicians to create fear by telling people who live so close to the edge already that they are going over that proverbial edge?

I am not saying that I completely understand this issue, so it seems like I need to do more research.  A while back, the government threatened to shut itself down, which means that no government worker would get paid.  Soldiers are government workers, too, and I can't imagine what they and their families thought, especially those currently serving overseas, when they found out that their hard work might not be rewarded after all.  Even the politicians in some states have come under fire for accepting their paychecks when the state or local governments were threatening to shut down.  Well, I ask you, what exactly are they supposed to do?  If you are not independently wealthy, then you probably work.  People work, not for the sheer joy of it all, but because they need that money to sustain their lives.  Food, clothing and shelter does not come cheaply anymore.  And if all we can afford is food, clothing and shelter with no luxuries whatsoever, what kind of country are we living in?  What kind of country are we living in when the President of the United States tells all of the elderly who depend on Social Security, some so that they can continue living in Assisted Living or nursing homes, that they will not be seeing anymore money--money they themselves paid into the system for decades?

It seems like the word "security" in Social Security is a misnomer; if the government can shut down, then none of us are really safe.

1 comment:

  1. Social Security as we know it has been squandered by our elected officials. The "boomers", as they're casually known, are truely the victims of history's biggest ponzi scheme. As with other ponzi schemes, Social Security has reached deficit spending point, after which the increases in new investments will no longer account for the payment of returns. It reminds me of the old days of the American West, when a man could go to the bank and request to withdrawal his money, and the banker would reply, "You can't get your money. We've been raided by bandits, and the blew the vault." Indeed our parent's vault has been looted.
    It is fortunate for all of us that Social Security has not always been an "American" way of life. Although varying forms of social security have existed since our colonization, SSA as we know it has only been in place since 1935 (source:ssa.gov). Historically, the reneging on a promise by our government is somewhat of an American tradition. Americans have been resilient long before the SSA, and will continue to be long after. What does this mean? One, that we will take care of our parents in retirement, not unlike the families in post-war Europe have done. Second, that we will likely work to the age of death. Not work to death (Candyce). Afterall, it is only work.
    The question that remains is this: Why was the social security money spent in the first place? Why is our president talking about lowering the debt ceiling? How has our government ballooned into such a self-indulgent monster that it is only satisfied when it is spending? The answers, in part, are these...
    Our President, our Senators, and our Representatives make far too much money. These positions are positions of service, not prestige. The service should be viewed as a privilege, not a right. Our elected officials need to serve their constituents with humility and honor.
    Legislation must be written to limit rider bills by forcing them to meet some relational criteria to title subject of the bill. This will shorten the overall lengths of the bills, so they can be read before being voted on.
    DOE can go away. Put the strategic oil reserves in the hands of the Congress.
    Level tarrifs! The US net exports (exports-imports) was $-477 billion in Q1FY11, contributing only .1% to real GDP. There was a time when we actually manufactured in this country, and the things we made were quite remarkable. That is, you didn't have to go to Walmart and buy another one eveytime you needed it. They lasted for years, and people trusted the stamp, "Made in the USA".

    Since I have no intentions of running for office in the near future I shall have to cut this short. I just saw a blog, and I wanted to contribute. Hey, it's kind of like going to the polls and voting... you get to put your two cents in!

    ReplyDelete